pd l1 inhibitor screening assay kit Search Results


93
AMS Biotechnology pd-1[biotinylated]:pd-l1 inhibitor screening assay kit
Pd 1[Biotinylated]:Pd L1 Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit, supplied by AMS Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pd-1[biotinylated]:pd-l1 inhibitor screening assay kit/product/AMS Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd-1[biotinylated]:pd-l1 inhibitor screening assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
BPS Bioscience pd l1 inhibitor screening assay kit
a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and <t>PD-L1</t> blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.
Pd L1 Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pd l1 inhibitor screening assay kit/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd l1 inhibitor screening assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
BPS Bioscience pd
a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and <t>PD-L1</t> blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.
Pd, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pd/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
BPS Bioscience pdl1 inhibitor screening assay kit
a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and <t>PD-L1</t> blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.
Pdl1 Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pdl1 inhibitor screening assay kit/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pdl1 inhibitor screening assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
BPS Bioscience competitive binding kinetics assay kits
a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and <t>PD-L1</t> blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.
Competitive Binding Kinetics Assay Kits, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/competitive binding kinetics assay kits/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
competitive binding kinetics assay kits - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BPS Bioscience pd l1 inhibitor colorimetric screening assay kit
a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and <t>PD-L1</t> blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.
Pd L1 Inhibitor Colorimetric Screening Assay Kit, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pd l1 inhibitor colorimetric screening assay kit/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd l1 inhibitor colorimetric screening assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
BPS Bioscience inhibitor screening assay kit
a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and <t>PD-L1</t> blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.
Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/inhibitor screening assay kit/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inhibitor screening assay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and PD-L1 blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of US-triggered deep-tissue activation of SPINs to release immunomodulators. b Schematic illustration of sonodynamic activation of SPINs to debulk tumor, enhance tumor immunogenicity, and release immunomodulators in situ as well as synergetic action of IDO inhibition and PD-L1 blocking on enhancing antitumor immunity with alleviated irAEs relative to free-drug administration.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Activation Assay, In Situ, Inhibition, Blocking Assay

a Chemical structures of amphiphilic semiconducting polymeric modulators and schematic illustration of their self-assembly and surface modification to form SPINs. b The molar ratios of each component in different SPINs. c Zeta potentials and hydrodynamic sizes of different SPINs in 1× PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) ( n = 4). d Photographs of erythrocytes after incubation with 1× PBS buffer (negative control), 1% Triton X-100 (positive control), and 1× PBS buffer containing SPINs at the concentration of 100 µg/mL for 2 h, followed by centrifugation. e Hemolysis percentages of erythrocytes after incubation with SPINs at different concentrations for 2 h ( n = 4). f Schematic illustration of US irradiation of SPIN D2 solutions covered with a pork tissue. g ESR spectra of 1 O 2 for SPIN D2 (20 µg/mL) after US irradiation (1.2 W/cm 2 , 3 min) without or with coverage of pork tissues at different thicknesses. h Release profiles of aPD-L1 and NLG919 from SPIN D2 (40 µg/mL) after US irradiation for different time ( n = 4). i PD-L1/PD-1 binding activity assay after treatment with free aPD-L1 or SPIN D2 (40 µg/mL) with or without US irradiation ( n = 4). SPIN D2 – US versus SPIN D2 + US: P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was calculated via a two-tailed Student’s t test. *** P < 0.001. In ( g – i ), the power intensity of US irradiation was 1.2 W/cm 2 (1.0 MHz, 50% duty cycle). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Chemical structures of amphiphilic semiconducting polymeric modulators and schematic illustration of their self-assembly and surface modification to form SPINs. b The molar ratios of each component in different SPINs. c Zeta potentials and hydrodynamic sizes of different SPINs in 1× PBS buffer (pH = 7.4) ( n = 4). d Photographs of erythrocytes after incubation with 1× PBS buffer (negative control), 1% Triton X-100 (positive control), and 1× PBS buffer containing SPINs at the concentration of 100 µg/mL for 2 h, followed by centrifugation. e Hemolysis percentages of erythrocytes after incubation with SPINs at different concentrations for 2 h ( n = 4). f Schematic illustration of US irradiation of SPIN D2 solutions covered with a pork tissue. g ESR spectra of 1 O 2 for SPIN D2 (20 µg/mL) after US irradiation (1.2 W/cm 2 , 3 min) without or with coverage of pork tissues at different thicknesses. h Release profiles of aPD-L1 and NLG919 from SPIN D2 (40 µg/mL) after US irradiation for different time ( n = 4). i PD-L1/PD-1 binding activity assay after treatment with free aPD-L1 or SPIN D2 (40 µg/mL) with or without US irradiation ( n = 4). SPIN D2 – US versus SPIN D2 + US: P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was calculated via a two-tailed Student’s t test. *** P < 0.001. In ( g – i ), the power intensity of US irradiation was 1.2 W/cm 2 (1.0 MHz, 50% duty cycle). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Modification, Incubation, Negative Control, Positive Control, Concentration Assay, Centrifugation, Irradiation, Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test

a Schedule for the establishment of primary and distant tumors, triple systemic injection of SPINs (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) via tail vein, US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min), and analysis of immune responses. b , c Relative tumor volumes of primary ( b ) and distant ( c ) tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 6) after systemic injection of saline, free-drug mixture (on day 0, 3, and 6, 4 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1), or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). SPIN D2 + US versus drug + US: P < 0.0001 for primary tumors ( b ); SPIN D2 + US versus drug: P < 0.0001 for distant tumors ( c ). d Survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 10) receiving different treatments as indicated. e Schematic illustration of treatment of rechallenged tumor mouse models using SPINs. f Growths of rechallenged tumors in Panc02 tumor-bearing mice after injection of saline or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min) ( n = 5). Saline versus SPIN D2 + US: P < 0.0001. g The survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments followed by tumor rechallenge ( n = 10). h Flow cytometry analysis of populations of effector memory T cells in the spleen of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments followed by tumor rechallenge ( n = 4). Saline versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0059. i Differentially expressed gene numbers in tumor tissues of mice after different treatments. j Relative expression of Carl , Hmgb1-ps1 , Hmgb1-ps2 , Cd80 , Cd86 , Cd40 , Pdcd1 , Cd3e , Cd8a , Ifng , Gzmb , Cxcl1 , Cxcl2 , Cxcl9 , Cxcl10 , Cxcl11 , Ccl4 , Ccl5 , Il1b , Il2 , Il6 , Il7 , Il15 , Ido1 , and Cd274 in tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing mice after different treatments (the experiment was repeated independently five times with similar results). k Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of relative gene expression in tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments ( n = 5). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schedule for the establishment of primary and distant tumors, triple systemic injection of SPINs (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) via tail vein, US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min), and analysis of immune responses. b , c Relative tumor volumes of primary ( b ) and distant ( c ) tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 6) after systemic injection of saline, free-drug mixture (on day 0, 3, and 6, 4 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1), or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). SPIN D2 + US versus drug + US: P < 0.0001 for primary tumors ( b ); SPIN D2 + US versus drug: P < 0.0001 for distant tumors ( c ). d Survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 10) receiving different treatments as indicated. e Schematic illustration of treatment of rechallenged tumor mouse models using SPINs. f Growths of rechallenged tumors in Panc02 tumor-bearing mice after injection of saline or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min) ( n = 5). Saline versus SPIN D2 + US: P < 0.0001. g The survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments followed by tumor rechallenge ( n = 10). h Flow cytometry analysis of populations of effector memory T cells in the spleen of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments followed by tumor rechallenge ( n = 4). Saline versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0059. i Differentially expressed gene numbers in tumor tissues of mice after different treatments. j Relative expression of Carl , Hmgb1-ps1 , Hmgb1-ps2 , Cd80 , Cd86 , Cd40 , Pdcd1 , Cd3e , Cd8a , Ifng , Gzmb , Cxcl1 , Cxcl2 , Cxcl9 , Cxcl10 , Cxcl11 , Ccl4 , Ccl5 , Il1b , Il2 , Il6 , Il7 , Il15 , Ido1 , and Cd274 in tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing mice after different treatments (the experiment was repeated independently five times with similar results). k Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of relative gene expression in tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice after different treatments ( n = 5). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Injection, Irradiation, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

a Schematic of sono-immunotherapy of subcutaneous pancreatic mouse tumors covered with 5-cm tissue. b , c Relative tumor volumes of primary ( b ) and distant ( c ) tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 5) after systemic injection of saline, free-drug mixture (on day 0, 3, and 6, 4 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1), SPIN 0 or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). The primary tumors were covered with 5-cm tissue under US irradiation. SPIN D2 + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P < 0.0001 for primary tumors ( b ); SPIN D2 + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P < 0.0001 for distant tumors ( c ). d Survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 10) after different treatments for 60 days. e Schematic of US-mediated deep-tissue sonodynamic therapy of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors. f Radiolabeling stability of 131 I-SPIN 0 after storage in saline or 50% serum at 37 °C for different time ( n = 3). g , h SPECT imaging ( g ) and signal intensity ( h ) of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after systemic injection of 131 I-SPIN 0 (1.0 mL, 1.5 mg/mL) for different time ( n = 4). The white dotted circle indicated tumors. i Computed tomography (CT) imaging of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after systemic injection of saline or SPIN 0 (1.0 mL, 1.5 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 30 min). The white dotted circle indicated tumors. j Tumor volume of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors ( n = 3) after treatments as indicated for different days. Saline + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P = 0.0108. k H&E staining images of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after different treatments. The experiment was repeated independently three times with similar results. l Survival curves of orthotopic pancreatic tumor-bearing rabbits ( n = 4) after different treatments for 20 days. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic of sono-immunotherapy of subcutaneous pancreatic mouse tumors covered with 5-cm tissue. b , c Relative tumor volumes of primary ( b ) and distant ( c ) tumors of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 5) after systemic injection of saline, free-drug mixture (on day 0, 3, and 6, 4 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1), SPIN 0 or SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 0.6 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). The primary tumors were covered with 5-cm tissue under US irradiation. SPIN D2 + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P < 0.0001 for primary tumors ( b ); SPIN D2 + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P < 0.0001 for distant tumors ( c ). d Survival curves of Panc02 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice ( n = 10) after different treatments for 60 days. e Schematic of US-mediated deep-tissue sonodynamic therapy of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors. f Radiolabeling stability of 131 I-SPIN 0 after storage in saline or 50% serum at 37 °C for different time ( n = 3). g , h SPECT imaging ( g ) and signal intensity ( h ) of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after systemic injection of 131 I-SPIN 0 (1.0 mL, 1.5 mg/mL) for different time ( n = 4). The white dotted circle indicated tumors. i Computed tomography (CT) imaging of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after systemic injection of saline or SPIN 0 (1.0 mL, 1.5 mg/mL) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 30 min). The white dotted circle indicated tumors. j Tumor volume of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors ( n = 3) after treatments as indicated for different days. Saline + US versus SPIN 0 + US: P = 0.0108. k H&E staining images of orthotopic pancreatic rabbit tumors after different treatments. The experiment was repeated independently three times with similar results. l Survival curves of orthotopic pancreatic tumor-bearing rabbits ( n = 4) after different treatments for 20 days. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Injection, Irradiation, Radioactivity, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Imaging, Computed Tomography, Staining, Two Tailed Test

a , b Flow cytometry analysis of percentages of CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( a ), and CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( b ) in blood of mice ( n = 4) at 30 day after systemic administrations of saline, SPIN 0 , SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 1.2 mg/mL) or free-drug mixture (8 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). Saline – US versus drug − US: P = 0.0023; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0006; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0071 for CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( a ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0004; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0001; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0093 for CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( b ). c , d Flow cytometry analysis of percentages of CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( c ), and CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( d ) in spleen of mice ( n = 4) after different treatments for 30 days. Saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0008; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0005; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0015 for CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( c ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0001; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0002; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0049 for CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( d ). e Representative H&E staining images of liver after 30 days of treatments in different groups (white arrows indicate the infiltrated lymphocytes). The experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. f Heatmap to show relative fold of cytokine levels in serum of mice after different treatments for 30 days relative to those in saline control group. g , h Serum levels of ALT ( g ) and AST ( h ) in mice ( n = 5) after different treatments for 30 days. Saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0010; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0020; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0054 for ALT ( g ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0001; saline − US versus drug + US: P < 0.0001; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0013 for AST ( h ). i Summary comparison of the antitumor immunity and irAEs between SPIN D2 -mediated sono-immunotherapy and free-drug treatment. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Precision cancer sono-immunotherapy using deep-tissue activatable semiconducting polymer immunomodulatory nanoparticles

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31551-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Flow cytometry analysis of percentages of CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( a ), and CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( b ) in blood of mice ( n = 4) at 30 day after systemic administrations of saline, SPIN 0 , SPIN D2 (0.2 mL, 1.2 mg/mL) or free-drug mixture (8 mg/kg body weight for NLG919 and aPD-L1) with or without US irradiation (1.0 MHz, 1.2 W/cm 2 , 50% duty cycle, 10 min). Saline – US versus drug − US: P = 0.0023; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0006; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0071 for CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( a ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0004; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0001; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0093 for CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( b ). c , d Flow cytometry analysis of percentages of CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( c ), and CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( d ) in spleen of mice ( n = 4) after different treatments for 30 days. Saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0008; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0005; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0015 for CD3 + CD4 + Th cells ( c ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0001; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0002; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0049 for CD3 + CD8 + CTLs ( d ). e Representative H&E staining images of liver after 30 days of treatments in different groups (white arrows indicate the infiltrated lymphocytes). The experiments were repeated independently three times with similar results. f Heatmap to show relative fold of cytokine levels in serum of mice after different treatments for 30 days relative to those in saline control group. g , h Serum levels of ALT ( g ) and AST ( h ) in mice ( n = 5) after different treatments for 30 days. Saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0010; saline − US versus drug + US: P = 0.0020; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0054 for ALT ( g ); saline − US versus drug − US: P = 0.0001; saline − US versus drug + US: P < 0.0001; drug + US versus SPIN D2 + US: P = 0.0013 for AST ( h ). i Summary comparison of the antitumor immunity and irAEs between SPIN D2 -mediated sono-immunotherapy and free-drug treatment. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated via two-tailed Student’s t test; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Mouse PD-1[biotinylated]: PD-L1 inhibitor screening assay kit was purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Irradiation, Staining, Two Tailed Test